prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje
2023. urn:nbn:hr:224:118129
Rehlicki, Daniel
Catholic University of Croatia
Department of Nursing

Cite this document

Rehlicki, D. (2023). Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje (Master's thesis). Zagreb: Catholic University of Croatia. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:118129

Rehlicki, Daniel. "Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje." Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:118129

Rehlicki, Daniel. "Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje." Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:118129

Rehlicki, D. (2023). 'Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje', Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, accessed 17 April 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:118129

Rehlicki D. Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje [Master's thesis]. Zagreb: Catholic University of Croatia; 2023 [cited 2024 April 17] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:118129

D. Rehlicki, "Upute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje", Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, 2023. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:118129

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleUpute za autore u biomedicinskim časopisima o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda literature: presječno istraživanje
Title (english)Instructions for authors in biomedical journals regarding systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study
AuthorDaniel Rehlicki
MentorLivia Puljak (mentor)
Committee memberMarta Čivljak (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberDalibor Čavić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberLivia Puljak (član povjerenstva)
GranterCatholic University of Croatia
(Department of Nursing)
Zagreb
Defense date and country2023-09-21, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Abstract
Uvod: Upute za autore u časopisima pružaju informacije o zahtjevima časopisa u vezi s oblikovanjem i izvještavanjem radova. Brojna su istraživanja ukazala na nedovoljnu kvalitetu izvještavanja i metodologije sustavnih pregleda literature koji su objavljeni u literaturi. Stoga bi bilo korisno analizirati upute časopisa za autore koje se odnose na izvještavanje i metodologiju sustavnih pregleda literature. Cilj: Cilj istraživanja bio je analizirati upute za autore u časopisima indeksiranim u MEDLINE-u koje se odnose na izvještavanje i metodologiju sustavnih pregleda literature Metode: Analizirane su upute za autore u 20% časopisa indeksiranih u MEDLINE-u koji su se nalazili na popisu mrežnog kataloga Nacionalne medicinske knjižnice (NLM) 27. srpnja, 2021. Podatci su izdvojeni samo iz uputa objavljenih na engleskom jeziku. Izvedeni su podaci o postojanju naputaka o izvještavanju i metodologiji sustavnih pregleda. Rezultati: U analizu je uključeno 1237 časopisa. Više od polovice (N=677; 65%) uputa za autore nije spominjalo sustavne preglede literature. U 8% (N=104) uputa spomenuta je registracija sustavnog pregleda; 3% (N=39) uputa navelo je da je obavezna. U uputama je 8% (N=100) časopisa spomenulo PROSPERO (engl. International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews) registar sustavnih pregleda literature. Upute za izvještavanje protokola sustavnih pregleda imalo je 13% (N=155) časopisa te su svi spomenuli smjernicu PRISMA-P (engl. Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols). Upute o izvještavanju sustavnih pregleda imalo je 37% (N=459); 15% (N=186) uputa navelo je da je obavezno korištenje smjernice za izvještavanje. Mrežu EQUATOR (engl. Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research)spomenulo je u svojim uputama 38% (N=474) časopisa dok je ICMJE (engl. International Association of Medical Journal Editors) spomenulo 834 (67%) časopisa. U 1,6% (N=20) časopisa pronađene su upute u vezi s procjenom rizika pristranosti; 5 (0,4%) časopisa imalo je upute o izvođenju meta- analiza; 18 (1,5%) je imalo upute o kvaliteti u vezi s sustavnim pregledima. Pouzdanost dokaza sustavnih pregleda spomenuta je u dva (0,16%) časopisa. GRADE (engl. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) je spomenut u 10 (0,81%) njih, a alat AMSTAR (engl. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) u 7 (0,57%) časopisa. Upute u svezi s ažuriranjem sustavnih pregleda spomenula su dva časopisa samo u vidu „živućih“ sustavnih pregleda, a preglede sustavnih pregleda spomenuo je jedan časopis. Upute o izvođenju pretražnih pregleda (engl. scoping review) imalo je 21 (1,7%) časopisa. Zaključak: Časopisi indeksirani u MEDLINE-u rijetko sadrže upute za autore u vezi sa sustavnim pregledima. Kod dostupnih uputa te upute uglavnom spominju PRISMA smjernice za izvještavanje i PROSPERO za registraciju protokola sustavnog pregleda. Malo je časopisa dalo bilo kakve metodološke upute za sustavne preglede. Ažuriranje uputa časopisa za autore o očekivanjima izvještavanja i metodologije sustavnih pregleda moglo bi podići svijest autora o tim metodološkim razvojima u području sustavnih pregleda.
Abstract (english)
Introduction:Journals’instructionsfor authors provide information about the journals’requirements regarding manuscript formattingand reporting. Manystudies have shown suboptimalreportingand methodologyof published systematic reviews. Therefore, it would be useful to analysethe journals' instructions for authors regarding systematic review reporting and methodology. Aim:The aim of this study was to analyseinstructions for authors in journals indexed in MEDLINE regarding systematic review reporting and methodology. Methods:We analysedinstructions for authors in 20% of MEDLINE-indexed journals listed in the online catalogueof the National Library of Medicine (NLM) on July 27, 2021. We extracted data only from instructions published in English. We extracted data on the existence of instructions for reporting and methodology of systematic reviews. Results:Analysisincluded 1237 journals. More than half (N=677; 65%) of the instructions didnotmention systematic reviews. Systematic review registration was mentioned in 8% (N=104) of instructions; only 3% (N=39) of themstated that registration is required. In the instructions, 8% (N=100) of the journals mentioned the PROSPERO(International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews)registry. Instructions for reporting protocols of systematic review were found in 13% (N=155) of journals;all of them mentioned the PRISMA-P(Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols)guideline. Instructions for reporting of systematic reviewswere found in 37% (N=459) of journals; 15% (N=186) stated that the use of the reporting guideline is required. The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research)networkwas mentioned in theinstructions of 38% (N=474) of journals. The ICMJE(International Association of Medical Journal Editors) was mentioned by834 (67%) journals. Instructions regarding risk of bias assessment were found in 1.6% (N=20)of instructions; 5 (0.4%) journals had informationregardingperforming meta-analyses; 18 (1.5%) had instructions related to the quality in context of systematic reviews. Certainty of evidence assessment insystematic reviewswas mentioned in two (0.16%) journals. GRADE(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations)was mentioned in 10 (0.81%) of them, and the AMSTAR(A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews)tool in 7 (0.57%) journals.Updating of systematic reviews was addressed intwo journals only andthey were related tolivingsystematic reviews. Overviewsof systematic reviewswere mentioned inone journal. There were 21 (1.7%) journalswith instructionsregarding scoping reviews. Conclusion:Journals indexed in MEDLINE rarely had instructions for authors regarding systematic reviewreporting and methodology. The available instructionsmostly referredto the PRISMA reporting guidelines and PROSPERO for registration of systematic reviews. Few journals provided any guidance for systematic reviewmethodology. Updating the journal's instructionsfor authors regarding systematic review reporting and methodologycould raise authors' awareness of methodological developments in the field of systematic reviews.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:224:118129
Study programmeTitle: Department of Nursing
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra sestrinstva (magistar/magistra sestrinstva)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-10-02 10:32:42