Terrorism as a form of violent acting is not a phenomenon of modern era. Namely, it appears in the 1. century, while India is used as a modern example of terrorism, due to their bomb philosophy. Democracy, modernism and liberalism go hand and hand with spreading of terrorism, because of bigger human rights, that enabled more posibilities for violent acting. Generaly speaking, terrorism is defined as an action directed towards killing or hurting civilians as objective to transfer a message to those in command, or just to eradiate fear and panic. Due to development of social sciences, more attention is being drawn to theoretical perspectives of terrorism, and some of them are the following: theories of power, theories of social movements and organisational theories. As cause of terrorism, Rex. A. Hudson is proposing couple of hypothesis, such as frustration- anger, negative identity and narcissistic anger. Terrorism is shown as non- effective form of meeting individual political goals. However, terrorists as very well informed about advanteges of mass media and technology of 21. century, so they use them while planning their furthure actions or to recrute more members for the organisation. Because of the evolution of mass media, informational terrorism is also evolving and terrorist network is spreading accros the world. On the other hand, the media is using terrorist attacks to improve their ratings and to make more profit, while journalists with their sensationalism in reports are „feeding“ terrorist who are hungry for media attention, and there for encourage them to attack again. Education, more strict laws regarding media reports about terrorism and redefining of ethics and moral of objective journalism, are some of the steps that need to be made to minimaze terrorist manipulation of media, as well as media manipulation of public. Regarding, the question is where is the line of media freedom and what are negative and positive sides of censorship.